May 04

microsoft.jpg

Now I’ve had more time to think about the matter. And I still can’t see why Microsoft would try to buy out Yahoo! I understand that Microsoft has been badly smacked when Google bought Doubleclick right under its nose. But this looks more like an impulsive move rather than a well thought best laid plan. Both companies could certainly benefit from the merging/takeover by creating an important, if not the most important, source for news and content on the net and possibly multiply exponentially their respective ADs revenue.

Most bloggers around the net, however, suggest that Microsoft also wants to start building an effective offense against Google’s web office suite. Now that would certainly disturb Google’s plans, but correct me if I’m wrong here but doesn’t that jeopardize Microsoft’s plans as well.

Microsoft Office is a very important source of revenue for the company and, although it’s widely accepted that the future of the application is on the web, that is not going to be an easy transition, and spending 50 billions to buy Yahoo! to then burn another considerable amount of money to integrate their products and move Microsoft’s leading product suite to the web seems an incredibly rash move.

Furthermore bringing a team from Yahoo! to work alongside Microsoft’s on a web-based release of Office would be incredibly difficult. I’m talking about bringing all the new people up to speed. That would cause Microsoft to lose even more time whilst Google can calmly keep updating its already launched suite.

I just can’t see it happening.

The WSJ has a very interesting piece about how the acquisition can’t be happening with allot more financial details.

WSJ comparison

P.S. I stole the images from TechCrunch post on the matter.

May 04

Senator Barack ObamaNaught but a political move, a smart and correct one nonetheless.

Barack Obama has submitted a request to the DNC for the political debates to be release under the Creative Commons. I quote from Slashdot:

“I am a strong believer in the importance of copyright, especially in a digital age. But there is no reason that this particular class of content needs the protection. We have incentive enough to debate. The networks have incentive enough to broadcast those debates. Rather than restricting the product of those debates, we should instead make sure that our democracy and citizens have the chance to benefit from them in all the ways that technology makes possible.”

I am, I must say, very impressed by how American politicians are reaching out to people during this election. MySpace pages etc, all very artificial and created by professional agencies, nevertheless admirable.

I remember just last year the general elections in Italy, a bunch of 90 year old candidates who’d never seen a computer in their whole life and didn’t even bother to try and stop using those horrible horrible posters with their decrepit faces on spelling “NEW IDEAS for this country”.

Needless to say I totally approve Obama’s request and seriously hope that it’ll be approved, I’d love to be able to read what smart people like Jeff Jarvis and other bloggers have to say about the debates when they’re free to re-edit and publish them with their commentary.

May 04

I’ve been reading all over the web that Microsoft is set to acquire Yahoo! ! I’d like to see that. One company that can’t innovate to save its own life acquiring another big company which did great things and now is struggling to regain its cool, save for Flickr, last cool acquisition by Yahoo!

They’ll really form the icy north. Thought this map was amusing.

Now seriously. I think it’s admirable that Yahoo! has finally started tidying up its services and integrating some of the companies it acquired recently. But merging/being acquired by Microsoft, please, Yahoo!, you’re still cooler than that!

Your argument may be that Microsoft and Yahoo! together would create an incredibly important bucket of content on the net and would probably increase their potential to monetize all the ADs on the their sites. And that is fundamentally true, and it will be while there’s still people who learned to use a computer in the mid eighties and discovered Yahoo in the early nineties. But let me ask you, who do you know that uses Yahoo! news or MSN as his/her homepage and is younger than 30, I’ll give you the answer, nobody, or almost nobody. My generation just runs a search on Google for whatever news we need, and most likely the first search term is Wikipedia.

If you ask me the map is right in dividing the world of the web that way, having a working and useful web service is not enough to make a splash today, it’s all about being cool.

Microsoft doesn’t need to acquire Yahoo! and Yahoo! is not so desperate that it wants to be acquired. Come up with something that’ll blow me away, then and there you’ll start re-gaining your cool!

I know this is just me waffling but I haven’t got much time to produce a nice write up, so you’re gonna have to make do with this!

May 03

Jeff Jarvis has a very interesting piece/update about O’reilly’s code of conduct for blogs. Apparently it has found a new supporter, and a rather important one.

May 02

Just a quick update, apparently Joost was way ahead of me, today all the members received unlimited (999) invitations. So that’s the end of my elevator-pitch competition, no more comments, I’ll invite today all of you (14) who left a comment so far.

Thank you all for your visits and comments.

May 02

Digg bounds to the mobI haven’t got time to write an entire article now but I wanted to post a link for those of you who don’t know what happened yesterday on Digg.

Somebody dug a link to the new HD DVD Decryption code, the Digg team diligently removed the link after receiving a cease and desist.

Oh no they didn’t, all hell broke lose, hundreds of users started Digging thousands of stories containing the code, and the feeble attempt of Digg CEO Jay Adelson to explain what was happening on Digg’s blog just added fuel to the fire.
And certainly the fact that they started suspending accounts didn’t help!

Another post later on by Digg co-founder Kevin Rose waved the white flag, Digg genuflects in front of the mob, I quote from the article -

But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you’ve made it clear. You’d rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won’t delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be.

If we lose, then what the hell, at least we died trying.

More thoughts later… now I’ve really got to work!

Take it easy,

Stefano

UPDATE: For those of you who are interested the legal battle can be followed here!

preload preload preload