Nov 27

After much anticipation and hype the Gdrive seems to be on its way, or so the WSJ reports.

A Google spokeswoman declined to comment on any specific online storage plans beyond what it already offers as part of its email and other services. But she said in a statement that “storage is an important component of making Web [applications] fit easily into consumers’ and business users’ lives.”

Most companies, from small businesses to big giants are moving their environments online to make documentation/presentations or whatever else may be needed available to their employees, wherever they may be whenever they want.

As I said in a previous post Google is pushing its online productivity suite and a shared online storage could definitely give an additional boost to the entire system.
The online storage is one of the few reasons why I use .Mac, the second rationale behind the choice is that the interface is just brilliant, the iDisk is mounted as a file system and directly accessible from my Finder.

In my opinion if Google really wants to make the Gdisk a must have for small/big businesses a client software to access the data is vital – not because it works better, but because it is a step final users have to go through to get used to online storage solutions. Most people don’t, and won’t for a while, use Writely or Google’s new PowerPoint-ish software – they’ll keep creating documents in their local environment and the sensation of accessing a local drive to save their work will make them feel somewhat more secure.

For its office components to attract big businesses Google still has do a great deal of work on the corporate accounts handling side – being able to organize accounts in groups and set different access permissions on a Gdisk’s folders would be a great start.
Another useful additional feature, which as I understand is due sometime soon, is offline availability of the applications. An internet connection is not always available and an entire company can’t just stop working because IT people in the basement are messing around with routers.

Having said that it’s not only functionality-related issues Google has to address but also privacy and security questions. If they want more of our data to be stored on their servers, and with Gdisk it wouldn’t only be images and documents but all sort of data we may not want other people to see, we expect Google to have some pretty satisfactory answers ready – Especially when we’re talking about reserved and potentially vital information its business customers save in the cloud.

Tagged with:
Nov 22

During my short yet intense career I have worked for quite a few startups and small businesses. I want to talk about a phase most startups go through – Our application is crap, lets trash it and rebuild it from scratch.

Hindsight is something few people have and wisdom is just a myth, just a fancy name we have come up with to call our mistakes.
Nevertheless when a company outgrows the chrysalis stage and starts producing revenue and growing accordingly hindsight is one of management’s favorite words. It’s widely abused in every meeting. Who hasn’t heard at least once “With the benefit of hindsight we could have…”.
This special word makes the eager-developers brain click. There’s our chance to build the perfect application. We know what to avoid, we have wasted countless hours solving all the problems we found in our path before and we’re now ready to whip out the ultimate system.

Perhaps with a bit of hindsight, wisdom, or a wee little bit of both, our developers would realize that every time they start developing an application from scratch a whole new bunch of complications will crop up and will have to be solved. While this happens the management team who has promised to deliver in time to the big bosses is obviously breathing heavily down the programmers’ skinny necks.

This happened to me once, although we didn’t go as far as actually begin the development a countless amount of hours was wasted in meetings to trying and figure out what we were going to do and how.
The issue for many startups is that very often the software is developed hastily for lack of funding or time constraints. This generally leads to a structureless applications patched together at the last minute. That’s how it is and always going to be – and in my personal experience it’s definitely better this way than running out of funding because the entire process is managed by a megalomaniac-developer with serious ego-related issues.
Once the application is ready and the product is launched there’s never going to be time to stop. Look back. Amend emissions and non-blocking bugs until it’s too late. That’s just the natural process.

After 1 year of life the initial product will most likely be completely unrecognizable and changed/badly-patched in many of its core components. This will make keeping track of what’s exactly going on inside the software harder.
So now what.
The approach I’ve found most feasible and realistic is to gradually fix and produce documentation as the development progresses. A software, especially a website, will never stop evolving and the amount of feature-requests and bugs to fix will only increase with time, stopping the entire machinery to go back and fix is just not an option. However, whilst new functionalities are being added, they will probably have to be integrated with old ones. This is where wisdom can assist you. It is definitely worth spending a few hours more on each new piece of code to patch up the old part it has to touch. Gradually your development process will fall back on track and there won’t be any more wild panic because of obsolete or faulty routines and functions.

If, on the other hand, your software is rotten to the core and cannot be rescued, well, tough sob, you should probably have thought it through more carefully before putting your hands on the keyboard.

Having said that I’d like to add that rewriting an application is not entirely impossible, but it’s most likely going to be a colossal process which will require large sums of money.

Tagged with:
Nov 17

Google takes yet another step in its battle against Microsoft for domination of the corporate environment.

The software giant has recently released a set of APIs which will make migration from a Microsoft/any-other-system-you-may-use to Gmail incredibly simple.

“We’ve provided developer documentation and sample code that allows developers to build extremely sophisticated mail migration tools, some of which can be run by administrators to migrate centralized mail and some of which can be run by end-users to migrate mail from the desktop,” — Gabe Cohen, Google Apps product manager.

I couldn’t find any data about the usage of Google documents around. I expect the uptake of the application to be extremely high among non-corporate users. However, It seems that it will take a bit longer for small businesses and startups to get used to the service and start using it. Especially considering that most users have been educated in a Microsoft-ruled environment their entire professional life.

Google had previously released another set of tools to allow users and system administrators to migrate from most IMAP-based e-mail systems to Google Gmail.

Furthermore, as much as this set of APIs is a very interesting development, I hardly see a big corporation spending a considerable amount of dough and development time to migrate its entire system, similarly it’s going to be even harder for small business find the time and money to dedicate to this. Don’t take me to seriously now though. Companies like Capgemini, with 80,000 employees are in fact putting a first toe in the water and using Google Apps for some of its employees.

Nevertheless I’m sure all sort of open-source/free applications will sprout all over the internet to let disgruntled Outlook users switch to Gmail.

Tagged with:
Nov 17

The FundedThe Funded, a controversial website which lets entrepreneurs rate VCs performances and behavior, has pulled off a major PR stunt 2 days ago when the mind behind the project revealed himself to the press.
Unfortunately the entire thing didn’t exactly work out as planned as information leaked to the press/blogs well before the scheduled announcement time. TechCrunch and GigaOm among others were already reporting the name of The Man behind it hours ahead of the official announcement.

Adeo Ressi

The man, “Ted”, behind “The Funded” is Adeo Ressi. Ressi founded and sold casual gaming site Game Trust to RealNetworks this September for around $20 million. He also serves on the board of the X Prize Foundation, best known by their cash prize for civilian space exploration.

Not only entrepreneurs but also VCs can create a profile on the site and set the story straight – or rather, tell their side of it.
Oddly enough The Funded is not venture backed.

Tagged with:
preload preload preload